Buhari have the power to appoint me without NJC approval – Acting CJN says – Justice Tanko Muhammad, the acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Tanko Muhammad, has said that President Muhammadu Buhari does not need the approval of the National Judicial Council to appoint him as the acting CJN.
FINANCIAL WATCH gathered Justice Muhammad made the statement in response to a query given to him by the NJC, the body constitutionally empowered to recommend the appointment of chief justices and heads of courts.
A group, Centre for Justice and Peace Initiative, had written a petition to the NJC, asking the council to remove Muhammad as a justice of the Supreme Court for allowing himself to be sworn in by the President without recourse to the NJC.
In his response, however, Justice Muhammad said the NJC ought to be consulted only when a substantive CJN is being appointed or re-appointed.
He said, “In my respectful view, the National Judicial Council has no role to play in the appointment of an acting Chief Justice of Nigeria in the first instance, that is to say on first appointment. The council comes in where the appointment as the acting CJN is to be renewed or extended. I humbly refer to Section 231(4) of the 1999 Constitution.”
Muhammad noted that Justice Walter Onnoghen remained the substantive CJN, adding that the latter was only suspended.
The acting CJN said if the Appeal Court or the Code of Conduct Tribunal reversed Onnoghen’s suspension, he would immediately step aside and return to his former position as a justice of the Supreme Court.
He added, “It was for the larger interest of the judiciary and the constitutionality that I accepted to be sworn in as acting CJN with the conviction that if the order of January 23, 2019 is eventually set aside, the status quo would be restored.
“But before it is set aside, there should be no vacuum in the office of the CJN and the chairman of the NJC.”
Recalling how he was sworn in by the President, Muhammad said he was summoned to the Presidential Villa by Buhari and shown the certified true copy of a motion ex parte granted by the CCT and signed by its Chairman, Danladi Umar.
He said, “On January 25, 2019, I was summoned to the Aso Villa at the instance of the President. Prior to the summons, I was not aware of the fact that the Code of Conduct Tribunal made any order on January 23, 2019.
“Furthermore, beyond what I read in the newspapers and watched on the television just like any other Nigerian, I was not privileged to see any of the processes filed by the parties before the tribunal. Hence, I could not really appreciate the merit or demerit of divergent positions.
“On the 25th day of January, the President swore me in as the acing CJN and not as the substantive CJN. Justice Walter Onnoghen remains the CJN until he is removed from office in accordance with the provision of the constitution. He is only suspended.”
He, however, said he had nothing to do with the speech delivered by the President wherein the latter accused Onnoghen of frustrating his anti-corruption war.
Muhammad admitted that he was a member of the NJC panel that removed Justice Obisike Orji of the Abia State High Court for accepting to be sworn in as chief judge by the Abia State Government without a recommendation of the NJC.
He, however, said his own case was different because he was only appointed as an acting CJN.
Muhammad further stated that the substantive head of the judiciary had been suspended by a valid court order which made it right for him to take over in acting capacity.
The acting CJN therefore appealed to the NJC to dismiss the petition written against him.
Did he said Mr Buhari have the power to suspend the C J Onnoghen ?,but on what ground ? there are 3 main issues here to handle,then you can say wether Mr Buhari have the power to suspend CJ onnoghen.we have 3 arm of govt (1) the executive(2) the judiciary which operate in Nigeria even during military rule,but with advent of democracy we will add the 3rd arms of the govt (3) the legistrators,they makes the law and reflect the mode or wishes of the people or the will of the people.
The judiciary act as refree or interprete the law.This present consutution which have been going on review on since 1999,will still contains this check and balances, which is still in the present constitution,meaning the consutution provides the independence of the judiciary,and the executive and the legistrator cannot intervenes in the powers and independence of the judiciary.a judge can only remove for this (1)misconduct e.t.c(2)the judge can only be removed at the instant of any executive arm with the consent of the legistretors(3) the national judiciary council a judge can only be remove by his/her peers
Now on what ground is code of conduct tribunal ruling is based on ? Is it on Justice Onnoghen misconduct ? or did they said he failed to declare his correct income.The rule provides for govt official to declares their assets every 4 yrs.Now nobody have accused him of enriching himself by corrupt activites.NOW IS NOT MR BUHARI JUMPING THE GUN IN SUSPENDING THE CJN ? IS NOT THE CODE OF CONDUCT TRIBUNAL HAVING A HIDDEN AGENDA IN THEIR RECOMMENDATION,THEY HAVE NOT SAID THE DECLARATION OF ASSETS IS OVERDUE AT HIS NEXT DECLARATION OF ASSET HE WILL DO IT.THE DECLARATION OF ASSETS WAS INSTALLED TO INCREASES TRUST BETWEEN GOVT OFFICIAL AND THE ORDINARY CITIZEN, AND ALSO IN THE SPIRIT OF TRANSPARENCY.a CRIME CAN ONLY HAPPEN WHEN A CONVICTION IS DONE.THE CJN HAVE NOT DONE ANY THING WRONG ACCORDING TO THE LAW